Hilton Hhonors Worldwide: Loyalty Wars

Hilton HHonors Worldwide: Loyalty Wars 1. For what reason do you think the cutting edge type of FMPs is more economical than the previous structures like exchanging stamps and coupons? Exchanging stamps and coupons were required to surrender to more current types of faithfulness programs in light of the fact that: oCompetitive weight has made it fundamental for corporates to improve oTrades and coupons are not separating factors since they can be effortlessly imitated by contenders †¢Modern FMPs are progressively practical in light of the fact that they can withstand copying because of the accompanying reasons: oFMPs can give individual altered encounters to every shopper oData product lodging capacities of PCs has made data required for such customization effectively accessible oFMPs can profit coalitions through commonly gainful steadfastness programs oFMPs likewise help in portioning clients and plan modified administrations to each fragment 2. What are the advantages of HHon ors Program to Hilton? Hilton would profit by the HHonors Program through the accompanying techniques; oEfficient estimation of â€Å"Walking Cost†: The program would give authentic data about the clients and in this manner help Hilton to check the customers’ attributes which thusly would prompt better income and yield the board oBenefits from Double Dipping: The program permitted move of advantages inside Hilton and its accomplices which permitted the two sides to win monetary standards through joint clients. oBetter extent of picking up establishments/the executives gets: The program’s capacity to drive business made it increasingly rewarding for the littler lodgings to hit manage Hilton oEnhanced client relationship: The program empowered Hilton to give modified inn encounters to every one of its visitors which would thus help Hilton and its partners become the customer’s most loved oHelp increase corporate agreements: Hilton’s significant busin ess came through corporate customers and this program would help the corporate travel administrators guarantee consistence to their general travel strategy 3. What is the choice issue of Jeff Diskin? What options are left with him for HHonors program with declaration of serious prizes program by Starwood? †¢Context: Starwood, one of the significant contenders of Hilton, has reported the dispatch of â€Å"Starwood Preferred Guest Program† which is foreseen to be a greater steadfastness program than Hilton’s HHW which would be helped by a tremendous interest in promoting †¢Dilemma: Jeff Diskin, as the head of Hilton HHonors, needs to accept an approach Hilton’s response to the declaration and its future game-plan. †¢Alternatives: Jeff Diskin as of now has the accompanying alternatives to choose from; oCompete point to point with Starwood Position HHonors uniquely in contrast to Starwoods and clutch faithful individuals oCut down on its expenses and convey a similar business to increase better edges 4. What would it be advisable for him to do? Why? The different options can be assessed as referenced in the table given beneath; †¢All the four significant inn networks will before long beginning contending on visit stay programs hence prompting value wars which may bring about genuine harm to the business. †¢Overtly liberal dedication programs have different dangers which incorporate the accompanying: oCustomers will in general be assortment chasing and use reliability projects to make benefits oThus even the rehashing clients may go to other lodging networks oThe more the prizes, the more prominent the desire clients will have. Along these lines the prizes will in general be ever-higher oLoyalty programs for the most part work as rebate programs. In this manner by offering more noteworthy motivations, Hilton will certainly prepare the clients to expect lower costs which will prompt decreased edges and along these lines lower incomes †¢Cost slicing measures are probably going to be restricted in such assistance enterprises. Along these lines, Jeff Diskin ought to keep away from devotion wars and keep up current prizes levels. Further, he ought to investigate separating Hilton’s brand through manageable brand devotion. One potential measure could be to reposition the brand as an exceptional encounter and make brand steadfastness and brand enthusiasm as upper hands.

Developing Critical Thinking Free Essays

string(334) over chief anyway my mentality to this is the work must be done most importantly, in the event that it isn't done effectively, at that point I will address the individuals on a balanced and discover why, it might be that the individual needs some additional preparation and hence I have let them somewhere near not guaranteeing they have the right apparatuses to do the job. Have the option to basically evaluate own convictions, mentalities and worth frameworks THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BELIEFS, VALUE AND ATTITUDES Beliefs, perspectives and qualities are three little words that have and have an enormous effect on who we are as people, what our identity is as individuals, and even how the world is seen without anyone else and others. A conviction is something that people or gatherings think, for example, putting stock in a divine being. Where a Value would be the living in the manners a religion expects, this worth will be produced using the conviction that the individual or gathering has in their God. We will compose a custom exposition test on Creating Critical Thinking or then again any comparative point just for you Request Now The disposition towards this would be the emotions, convictions and conduct propensities towards this, for instance imploring, perusing the sacred book, towards others that don't accept or have an alternate arrangement of ethics or convictions and so forth. Qualities To me a worth is a rule, a norm or even certain characteristics that people, individuals or even gatherings hold. These qualities/standards are one of if not the most significant things. These qualities/standards help to direct us a people and people. By control I mean how we live our lives, what we base our choices on. A Value is normally created by means of a conviction. This conviction would ordinarily be identified with worth of a thought or a specific sort of conduct. For instance I see incredible incentive in continually being amenable, anyway someone that has consistently got what they needed or have had an alternate up bringing may not put almost no or any incentive on being neighborly. These qualities can impact our dynamic and regularly the help we give our customers. In a work or expert condition as people we ought to guarantee that we don't attempt to impact our clients choices dependent on our qualities. As people we construct our qualities from different sources and beneficial encounters, these can be impacted by family, companions, work environment, instructive offices, life occasions, for example, demise, money related issues. Religion, music and so on. You do likewise have prevailing qualities; these qualities are regularly generally shared among gatherings, networks, religion or family. In spite of the fact that these predominant qualities are actually that, a similar prevailing worth may not be as imperative to another gathering or society. Conviction A conviction as recently expressed can help or lead to a particular worth, these convictions generally originate from genuine encounters, yet as people we frequently overlook the first experience isn't equivalent to what is at present happening now. For instance I Believe that Tottenham Hotspur is the best football crew on the planet, this depends on going gaga for the group in the mid 1980’s. Sensibly however over late years Tottenham battled in any event, being in a transfer fight. This shows there were at any rate 19 groups superior to them. It doesn't anyway change my conviction that they are the best football crew. Our convictions and qualities have a monstrous effect on our lives they can influence how we are seen, they can influence the nature of our work and even effect on the entirety of our connections loved ones. Properly or wrongly as people we as a whole will in general accept that our convictions depend on reality when entirely reality our convictions depend on past encounters. Convictions really begin to administer what and how we experience things, for example, viewing a football match-up, or in any event, working, these convictions that we hold as people and gatherings however can make up some portion of our character, what our identity is and how we live our lives and in this way are significant. Disposition Attitude we as a whole have it, and we as a whole case to know somebody with a terrible demeanor. What is a demeanor whether it is fortunate or unfortunate or even unconcerned. The word â€Å"attitude† can allude to an enduring inclination, conviction and conduct propensities coordinated towards explicit individuals, gatherings, thoughts or even items. A disposition will in general be a conviction about something, it ordinarily portrays what we as people consider as being right (constructive) or mistaken (adverse) method of accomplishing something. For instance my demeanor towards individuals who take is one of scorn is a negative mentality. Most definitely I have no compassion toward them or regret on the off chance that they get captured. That said the hoodlum perhaps a first and one time guilty party and has different issues I don't think about so my demeanor towards that depends on an exceptionally cliché speculation, as it is something I would not do. Anyway the way that I would not do it shows that my mentality toward not taking is a positive one. It is conceivable however that our own perspectives can be solid to the point that we become oblivious to different people groups esteems, feelings and requirements. A solid disposition is regularly alluded to as a worth, where as a demeanor with little essentialness or significance, are frequently depicted as assessments. Convictions, qualities, perspectives and the effect on my conduct. There are only a few convictions, Values and mentalities that I hold that sway on my conduct, not simply to the manner in which I act towards my ordinary errands, yet in addition the manner in which I act around my group and my clients/customers and providers. The first is habits, I accept that individuals should treat others the manner in which they wish to be dealt with themselves, so paying little heed to the circumstance I am consistently affable, obliging and proficient in my methodology. The worth I hold in regards to clients and customers, they are above all else and without them there would be no us as an organization. I accept my group are the most significant factor inside our branch, so they are counseled about any significant choices we actualize, in light of the fact that I think it is an extraordinary thought to change something doesn’t fundamentally imply that it is, after the entirety of my branch and group is just in the same class as its most vulnerable part. This occasionally can prompt be viewed as a push over chief anyway my mentality to this is the work must be done as a matter of first importance, in the event that it isn't done effectively, at that point I will address the individuals on a balanced and discover why, it might be that the individual needs some additional preparation and in this manner I have let them somewhere near not guaranteeing they have the right apparatuses to carry out the responsibility. You read Creating Critical Thinking in classification Papers That said if there is no sensible clarification I will address the issue and convey direct guidelines, these will consistently be reasonable yet firm, again in the event that every other person is carrying out a responsibility one way, at that point everybody ought to do it too I am exceptionally enthusiastic about Team work, and being a piece of a group. So relying upon the circumstance my conduct changes from pleasant continue ahead with everyone, to just about a tyrant if work isn’t being completed effectively. I am never discourteous or inconsiderate as I would not have any desire to be dealt with that way, I tune in to what others need to state before settling on a choice and where conceivable I will put together a choice with respect to others input rather than my own conclusions, convictions, mentalities or qualities. Have the option to basically evaluate the legitimacy of the executives speculations corresponding to claim convictions, perspectives and qualities. There are two administration hypotheses I discover applicable to my job, the first of these is Maslow’s chain of command of necessities. This hypothesis was created by Abraham Maslow in the 1940’s - 1950’s in the USA, this hypothesis is still particularly utilized today in understanding human inspirations, any human inspiration or absence of affects the people mentalities, convictions and qualities. The Maslow hypothesis was initially a five phase model which is more than sufficient for its motivation today is as yet utilized by many. The current model can have upwards of 8 phases and was created by others dependent on Maslow’s work. It tends to be contended that the stages 6,7 and 8 of the current model were typified in Maslow’s unique model in stage 5, which is Self-actualisation. Maslow’s unique model (5 phase model) Maslow hypothesis pyramid chart from Wikpedia.com This hypothesis is applicable to my job as it assists with getting a comprehension of people’s conduct fluctuates, what propels them, which can prompt telling me what a portion of their convictions and qualities are and even perspectives. For instance if the individual sees that they are being dealt with unreasonably at home (Biological and Physiological Needs) the people disposition might be brought into the work spot and they might not have indistinguishable qualities from myself and their demeanor towards different individuals from the group, customers or even providers may change drastically, which thusly impacts the people conduct. The self-actualisation is exceptionally helpful for me in my job as it permits me to get myself, If I am making some awful memories at home, or things are not going the manner in which I might want or individuals don't hold similar convictions, qualities and perspectives as I do I make a stride back and take a gander at everything from a third people perspective as it isn't the groups, clients, providers issue my day won't plan, it permits me at that point to pick how I approach the day and to remain by my increasingly constructive convictions, qualities and mentalities instead of the contrary ones I may have been feeling. The other hypothesis that I discover pertinent to my job is the mental agreement hypothesis, it is appeared beneath on a Vena outline. PC= PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT-covered up/implicit, unwritten and considers relationship references (r) VC=VISIBLE CONTRACT-typically composed, legally binding understanding between parties, pay, hours, occasions and so on. R=relationship among worker and market, and manager and market. This hypothesis is quick getting very applicable in the work environment in regards to associations with the working environment and much more extensive than that the human conduct inside a work environment. This hypothesis was first perceived in the 1960�

Charles Willard Moore - essays

Charles Willard Moore - articles Moore blended high design and high camp in with joyous surrender (Filler 52). At the point when he passed on in 1993 of a respiratory failure at age 68, companions and admirers commended his work and achievements saying that he left a living inheritance in the a huge number of modelers he prepared and propelled. He was additionally portrayed as the most persuasive design teacher (most prominently Yale for a long time and the University of California at Los Angeles) of his age. Not at all like numerous other star modelers he was likewise an incredible instructor, and for more than forty years he granted his tremendous information and energetic convictions with unrivaled insight, tenderness, and happiness to ages of understudies (Filler-1994 52). For over forty years, Moore imparted his vision to understudies that there is no higher reason for a draftsman than to make homes and open places that can fulfill and comfort individuals, just as give an advantage air in which one's internal life can be fulfilled alongside the physical requirement for asylum and solace. During his profession, he created twelve books, and dissimilar to most books on engineering composed by modelers, he delineated that it was conceivable to have a bigger vision about structure other than the longing to be new, extraordinary, or interesting. He was an author who was additionally an engineer instead of the typical designer who figures he can compose. The most paramount and fascinating of his books is The Place of Houses, composed with Gerald Allen and Donlyn Lyndon (his books consistently had co-writers) and distributed in 1974 (Filler-1996 80). Moore was the common California and is most popular work for his major work found along the bank of California from Los Angeles to his Sea Ranch on the Mendocino coast north of San Francisco, a milestone of naturally touchy plan worked during the 1960s. His work ranges from the dissident Faculty Club at the University of California at Santa Barbara to the University of California a... <!

Michael Phelps Bong Incident Personal Statement

Michael Phelps Bong Incident - Personal Statement Example This is the thing that I delighted in the most about David Harsanyi's article - that it offers an expansive view on both the Michael Phelps outrage and the contemporary suppression of Cannabis. In my answer to the article, I intended to communicate my sentiment concerning the main problems that in many cases get covered behind the sparkly, advertised up issues the broad communications appear to reliably embrace. I especially concur with the writer's general conclusion on the topic, so basically this letter was composed as an elaboration of the subject of ineptitude: that communicated by Phelps himself, and that which in some cases glances inseparable in our cutting edge society. In the wake of perusing on Michael Phelps' open stoning, I was constrained to communicate how I wholeheartedly concur with your essential issue: Phelps is a simpleton; however on the other hand, so is the war on cannabis. It's discomforting to acknowledge how in full on XXI century, our general public is still so effortlessly deluded into supporting the implementation of such glaring and over the top witch chases. These days we're living, one may have assumed that the news a 14-times gold medalist is likewise a pot smoker could assist individuals with acknowledging how the bits of gossip concerning the threats of pot may have been horribly misrepresented; however no, things being what they are, all that moderate individuals concentrated on was the way Michael Phelps not, at this point had a spot among the pantheon of positive good examples their kids ought to endeavor towards. Just demonstrates how our sentiments are so vigorously impacted, and our points of view so handily moved. I think you said all that needed to be said when you expressed how as a general rule, the most alarming part of the Michael Phelps occurrence is that we delivered an Olympic whiz sufficiently idiotic to put his colossal paws around a bong in full perspective on many partygoers furnished with mobile phone cameras. Granted, most pot smokers comprehend the forceful bias they're despite everything liable to in our general public, and some of them decide to keep their smoking propensities in hidden. However, relatively few of them have such high stakes as Phelps, and still he felt free to uncover himself like that. He ought to have known better, and he ought to have thought before snatching a bong in a school party (where somebody will undoubtedly snap an image), yet at that point - well, at that point he got high... furthermore, the rest is history. As I would like to think, Phelps submitted two coarse mistakes: the first was getting trapped in broad daylight with a bong, and the second (conceivably more regrettable) was offering an open expression telling the amount he was upset for his careless, adolescent conduct. As you've written in the last part of your article, most Americans who have smoked pot are probably not going to feel laments about doing as such - and Phelps himself, there's a decent possibility he's really sorry just of getting captured. His judgment fizzled, OK: not really by smoking pot, yet totally by doing as such in a situation that would probably realize repercussions that may bargain his profession. All things considered, it's implied: Michael Phelps is a nitwit. Be that as it may, at the same time, he's likewise an immense swimmer who has reliably shown off-the-diagrams expertise and limit. So imagine a scenario where he smokes pot If nothing else, that just demonstrates that pot smokers can become some different option from bums and parasites, as kept up by our beyond a reasonable doubt unsettled social generalizations. In any case (and to the extent I'm mindful)- pot isn't

Delias Marriage in Hurstons Sweat Essays -- Zora Neale Hurston

In Zora Neale Hurston’s short story, Sweat, Delia ends up stuck in a deplorable marriage. Her significant other, Sykes, abuses her, leaves all work to her, and is unfaithful. In the wake of being hitched to Sykes for a long time, Delia has lost all expectation in the marriage. The incalculable beatings and difficult demonstrations of Sykes have brought her over the edge. She is compelled to conflict with her exacting strict convictions due to the life where she has been driving since her marriage to her better half. One section that summarizes numerous groups of Delia and Sykes’s relationship is as per the following: â€Å"She lay conscious, looking at the flotsam and jetsam that jumbled their wedding trail. Not a picture left remaining en route. Anything like blossoms had quite a while in the past been suffocated in the salty stream that had been squeezed from her heart. Her tears, her perspiration, her blood. She had carried love to the association and he had brought an aching after the tissue. Two months after the wedding, he had given her the principal fierce beating. She had the memory of his various outings to Orlando with the entirety of his wages when he had come back to her poor, even before the main year had passed. She was youthful and delicate at that point, however now she thought of her knotty, muscles appendages, her brutal knuckly hands, and drew herself up into a troubled little ball in the huge quill bed. Past the point of no return presently to seek after affection, regardless of whether it were not Bertha it would be another person. This case varied from the others just in th at she was bolder than the others. Past the point of no return for everything aside from her little home. She had fabricated it for her past times, and planted individually the trees and blossoms there. It was flawless to her, lovely.† (Hurston 680).      This scene happens when Delia is lying on her bed, considering what had recently occurred. Sykes had returned home, and obviously, a battle ejected between the two previous darlings. The distinction about this encounter however, was that Sykes didn't strike Delia, as what typically occurs. Delia got a metal skillet and took steps to protect herself from her better half as he cowed in dread of being hit. This new methodology from Delia, including another terrorizing, shows how her superfluous perspiration and difficult work had been able to be excessively. The demonstration of holding onto a skillet from the oven to secure herself represents how basically, Delia is attempting to guard her home. The skillet is a section of the house, and as she st... ...h will happen that night. The conditions of any person’s life will in the end choose the result. Negative conditions can be tolerable enough that there won't be an exhaustive change in one’s life, yet more awful circumstances can have various impacts. Once in a while an individual is compelled to roll out an improvement in the manner they carry on with their life so as to make it passable. In Sweat, by Zora Neale Hurston, Delia’s mentality toward her terrible marriage changes due to her absence of perseverance for her life. The fire behind her eyes could never again be confined by Sykes’ abuses and unfaithfulness. Delia’s water had bubbled over and what come about was a fire of another sort. She went up against all that Sykes was with a recently discovered lack of interest, and would stand firm against his bad behaviors. The inquiry wherein the finish of the story asks needs to manage Delia’s commitment to God and her religion. Is it OK to allow him to bite the dust? One may respond to the inquiry in any case, yet basically, the reaction will be found entirely subjective. Works Cited Hurston, Zora Neale. Sweat. The Story and Its Writer An Introduction to Short Fiction. Ed. Ann Charters. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1999. 678-687.

The Fat Lady

The Fat Lady Hi! How are you? The woman smiled as she took the seat beside me. She had to lower herself slowly, squeezing her ample bottom into the seat, filling all available space.Positioning herself comfortably, she plopped her enormous arm on our common armrest. Her immensity saturated the space around us, shrinking me and my seat into insignificance.I cringed and reclined towards the window. She leaned towards me and repeated her greeting in an upbeat, friendly voice. Her face towered above my head, forcing me to turn to look at her. Hi, I replied with obvious loathing.I turned away to stare out the cabin window, sulking silently about the long hours of discomfort I was going to experience with this monster beside me.She nudged me with her meaty arm. My name is Laura. Im from Britain. How about you? Japan?Malaysia, I barked.Im so sorry! Will you accept my heartfelt apology? Come, shake my hand. If were going to spend six hours side-by-side on this flight, wed better be friends, dont you thi nk? A palm waved in front of my face. I shook the hand reluctantly, still silent.Laura started a conversation with me, taking no notice of my unfriendly reactions. She talked excitedly about herself and her trip to Hong Kong to see her frinds. She rattled off a list of things she was going to buy for her students in the boarding school where she was teaching.I gave her one-word answers to her questions about me. Unperturbed by my coldness, she nodded as she made appreciative comments to my answers. Her voice was warm and caring. She was considerate and obliging when we were served drinks and meals, making sure that I had room to manoeuvre in my seat. I dont want to clobber you with my elephant size! she said with utmost sincerity.To my surprise, her face which repulsed me hours before, now opened into extraordinary smiles, lively and calm at the same time. I couldnt help but let down my guard slowly.Laura was an interesting conversationalist. She was well read in many subjects from philosophy to science. She turned a seemingly unimportant subject into something to explore and understand. Her comments were humorous and inspirational. When our topic turned to cultures, I was pleasantly surprised by her intelligent comments and well-thought-out analysis.During our conversation, Laura managed to make every cabin crew who served us walk away laughing at her jokes.When a flight attendant was clearing our plates, Laura cracked several jokes about her size. The flight attendant roared with laughter as she grabbed Lauras hand, You really make my day!For the next few minutes, Laura listened attentively and gave pointers to the flight attendants weight problem. The grateful attendant said before she rushed off, Ive got to work. Ill come back later and talk to you about it.I asked Laura, Have you ever thought about losing some weight?No. Ive worked hard to get this way. Why would I want to give it up?You arent worried about cardiovascular diseases that come with being ove rweight?Not at all. You only get the diseases if youre worried about your weight all the time. You see advertisements from slimming centres that say, Liberate yourself from your extra baggage so that you are free to be yourself. Its rubbish! Youre liberated only if youre comfortable about who you are, and what you look like any time of the day and anytime of the year! Why would I want to waste my time on slimming regimes when I have so many other important things to do and so many people to be friends with? I eat healthily and walk regularly; Im this size because I am born to be big! There is more to life than worrying about weight all day long.She sipped at her wine. Besides, God gives me so much happiness that I need a bigger body to hold all of it! Why would I lose weight to lose my happiness? Taken aback by her reasoning, I chuckled.Laura continued. Folks often see me as a fat lady with big bosoms, big thighs and a big bottom that no man would even bother to cast a glance at. Th ey see me as a slob. They think Im lazy and have no willpower. Theyre wrong. She held up her glass to a passing flight attendant. More of this magnificent wine, please. She smiled sweetly at the attendant. Great service from your crew. May God bless all of you.She turned to me, Im actually a slim person inside. Im so full of energy that people wont be able to keep up with me. This extra flesh is here to slow me down, otherwise Ill be running everywhere chasing after men!Do men chase after you? I asked jokingly.Of course they do. Im happily married but men still keep proposing to me.Most of them have relationship problems and they need someone to confide in. For some reason, they like to talk to me. I think I should have been a counsellor instead of a school teacher!Laura paused before she said thoughtfully, You know, the relationship between men and women is so complicated. Women worship men and call them, Honey until they find out they have been lied to, and then they turn into bit ter gourds! Men love women so much that they see them as their soul mates until they look at their credit card bills, and then women become devils with tridents!Lauras enthralling conversation had turned the flight into something thoroughly enjoyable. I was also fascinated by the way people were drawn to her. By the end of the flight, almost half the cabin crew was standing near the aisle by us, laughing and joking with Laura. The passengers around us joined in the merry-making too. Laura was the centre of attention, filling the cabin with delightful warmth.When we waved goodbye to each other at the arrival lounge at Hong Kongs Kai Tak Airport, I watched her walking towards a big group of adoring adults and kids. Cheers sounded as the group hugged and kissed Laura. She turned around and winked at me.I was stunned, as the realisation set in: Laura was the most beautiful woman I had ever met in my life.By Chong Sheau Ching

Homosexuality and the Christian Faith - Free Essay Example

Homosexuality has always been a controversial issue in many religions and is increasingly becoming more relevant in society. Throughout the past centuries, homosexuals would hide their sexual orientation to prevent the cruel punishments and ridicule that would result from openly accepting themselves to the public. Today, more people identify within the homosexual spectrum as society gradually becomes accepting of same-sex relationships and marriages. However, religion is a factor that restricts the growth of homosexuality acceptance throughout the entire world. Homosexuality is often perceived to be taboo and an abomination to society in the eyes of many Christians. This causes a large divide between the two communities as both groups have conflicting views on the issue. Homosexuality and Christianity is divided due to the interpretations of Bible teachings, varying religious views on the matter, and the difficulty for one to be a part of both communities. Many people who are affiliated with Christianity are opposed to the idea of same-sex relationships due to the interpretation that it violates teachings in the Bible. David P. Gushee, a professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University, discusses the most-referenced bible verses regarding the Christian ban on homosexuality in Evangelical Christianity and how they are interpreted in Reconciling Evangelical Christianity with Out Sexual Minorities: Reframing the Biblical Discussion. There are six main verses that are used to reference the intolerance of homosexuality in Christianity: Genesis 1-2, Genesis 19, Leviticus 18:22, Matthew 19:1, Romans 1:26, and Corinthians 6:9 (Gushee 145). Evangelical Christians associate these verses with a male and female paradigm being the only acceptable form of relationship in society. The texts are often centered around sexual acts rather than relationships and offer harsh language towards the acts (Gushee 146). However, they do not relate to modern se xual identity and orientation. Gushee concludes his essay with the idea that many Evangelical Christians draw a moral line that causes people to be driven away from the church and God (Gushee 153). In The Bible on Homosexuality: Exploring Its Meaning and Authority, Kenneth A. Locke, a professor at Hsi Lai University, explains the importance the Bible has on morals for Christians, including homosexuality. The Bible is the fundamental resource for many Christians when it comes to inspiration and guidance. The Bible is still relevant because it can be related to life today, but still lacks information on social issues that are more prominent now than they were when the text was written (Locke 126). Locke also explains the biblical verses in relation to the historical and cultural context, discussing how many translated words are potential errors and how they can be interpreted in many ways. Many Christians can interpret biblical texts differently, causing some Christians to either oppo se or accept homosexuality. Another factor that causes a division between homosexuality and Christianity is the different views Christians have on homosexuality. Many Christians are taught to have certain beliefs on issues throughout society, including homosexuality, depending on who they are surrounded with and who they are raised by. Dawne Moon, a professor in the Department of Social and Cultural Sciences at Marquette University, discusses the different views religious Christians have towards homosexuality in Beyond the Dichotomy: Six Religious Views of Homosexuality. There are two main sides to the argument consisting of the belief that an individual is born homosexual, and the belief that sexual orientation can and should be changed (Moon 1216). However, Christian views can be further divided into homonegative, moderate, and homopositive. Homonegative Christians view homosexuality as sinful and an abomination while homopositive ones view it as good and just. Moderate Christians have both negative and posit ive views towards the issue (Moon 1218). The difference in views shows how there is no one universal belief regarding homosexuality in Christianity. There are many ways to disprove both arguments for and against homosexuality; therefore, a Christians view will be up to the individuals interpretation and beliefs. The varying views Christians have on homosexuality creates a division because there is not one common belief on the matter. It is often difficult for an individual to be both a Christian and homosexual. Typically, homosexuals are pushed away from Christianity due to differences in views on same-sex relationships and commonly-occurring discrimination. Nasrudin Subhi and David Geelan studied the effects Christianity has on current and former Christians who identify as homosexual in When Christianity and Homosexuality Collide: Understanding the Potential Intrapersonal Conflict. The survey conducted revealed that eighty percent of homosexuals who were affiliated with Christianity experienced conflict between the two communities (Subhi 1396). The conflicts between the two have affected the participants through high rates of depression, guilt, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, and isolation (Subhi 1399). In the essay 1Cross + 3Nails = 4GVN: Compulsory Christianity and Homosexuality in the Bible Belt Panopticon, Bernadette Barton, a professor at the University of Kentucky, discusses homophobia and discrimination based on sexuality in a region where Christianity is the primary religion, the Bible Belt. The area consists of the West South Central, East South Central, and South Atlantic regions of the United States where Christianity dominates the majority of the population (Barton 72). Barton, a self-identified lesbian, discusses experiences where she was discriminated against for her sexual orientation and the Bible was used to justify it. She also includes a story of a homosexual man who knew he was same-sex attracted since the age of eleven but never came out due to the fear that he would be in danger and alienated from his family. Another story is also told of a woman who came out to her family who thought she had a devil within her that was causing her to be homosexual. Her family attempted to keep her captive in their house to have a preacher pray the homosexuality out of her (Barton 79). Bartons study of homosexuals in the Bible Belt shows that they are often placed in harmful situations where they are rejected from society completely or experience physical violence on the basis of their sexual identity. Individuals who identify within the homosexual spectrum experience difficulty when it comes to accepting their sexuality and Christianity as one and are typ ically forced to choose one over the other. This is due to the difference in beliefs on homosexuality and the dangers and discrimination that accompanies the sexual orientation. The divide between homosexuality and Christianity is caused by the interpretations of biblical teachings, the difference in views, and the difficulty for an individual to be both a Christian and a homosexual. The issue is becoming more prevalent in society as more people are becoming more comfortable publicly identifying with their sexual orientations. The division between homosexuality and Christianity may persist in the future as the belief of whether homosexuality is morally acceptable is at the discretion of the individual. Works Cited Barton, Bernadette. 1CROSS 3NAILS = 4GVN: Compulsory Christianity and Homosexuality in the Bible Belt Panopticon. Feminist Formations, vol. 23, no. 1, 2011, pp. 70â€Å"93, muse-jhu-edu.libweb.lib.utsa.edu/article/429860. Accessed 24 Sept. 2018. Gushee, David P. Reconciling Evangelical Christianity with Our Sexual Minorities: Reframing the Biblical Discussion. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, vol. 35, no. 2, 2015, pp. 141â€Å"158, muse-jhu-edu.libweb.lib.utsa.edu/article/603262. Accessed 24 Sept. 2018. Locke, Kenneth A. The Bible on Homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 48, no. 2, Sept. 2005, pp. 125â€Å"156, www-tandfonline-com.libweb.lib.utsa.edu/doi/pdf/10.1300/J082v48n02_07?needAccess=true. Accessed 29 Sept. 2018. Moon, Dawne. Beyond the Dichotomy: Six Religious Views of Homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 61, no. 9, Oct. 2014, pp. 1215â€Å"1241, www-tandfonline-com.libweb. lib.utsa.edu/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2014.926762. Accessed 22 Sept. 2018. Subhi, Nasrudin, and David Geelan. When Christianity and Homosexuality Collide: Understanding the Potential Intrapersonal Conflict. Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 59, no. 10, 1 Nov. 2012, pp. 1382â€Å"1402, www-tandfonlinecom.libweb.lib.utsa.edu/doi/abs/10.108000918369.2012.724638. Accessed 22 Sept. 2018.